Global warming: can we resist to its “negative repercussions”
In the field of environment protection, it is a long time now since the situation is getting worse and worse; the warnings of all these years have not prevented “predators” to continue their work to undermine the major ecological balance.
The ordinary mortals we are ignore no more the imminence of this consequently danger seriousness but unfortunately the important decision-makers across the world do.
The greenhouse effect is essential for our survival; without it, Earth would be a much colder place, incapable of sustaining life as we know it. However, if the quantity of heat retained increases over time due to an overabundance of greenhouse gases, the atmosphere and even the oceans may begin to warm on a global scale.
Heating of the air and oceans would cause glaciers and polar ice to melt, raising sea levels worldwide. In fact, we are witnessing the occurrence of such events now.
The picture is even more chaotic that there is a clear interaction between the various components of ecological balance. The global warming will impact on activity of the oceans which changing levels could become a threat against the planet.
”Ignoring climate change will surely be the most costly of all possible choices, for us and for next generations”.
Humanity is thus sacrificed to stakes of an unbridled race to the growth rate which justifies itself by an optimized functioning of plants and therefore an appeal with high debit side in polluting energies. If a human being is hurt on a party of his/her body, he/she will keep physical and psychological after effects in spite of efficient care. The same goes for nature if it is deprived of drills, of snows, if seas exceed their requested level and if the cycle of seasons is disturbed. The damages caused to our environment are a bomb, man risks to provoke the explosion. None now seems to believe for a moment in the preservation of this nature without being taxed of backward looking, because the modernity imposes the speed, the accumulation of goods and a cult of profit celebrated at the expense of time to live.
The third millennium is not certainly that of J.J. Rousseau, the American poet David Thoreau, nor even that of Arthur Rimbaud who, in his sublime “Dormeur Duval”, celebrated both man and nature.
It is for the masters of the world a terrible responsibility if they persist in this logic of chaos which will make a final fate to this planet about which Galileo Galieli had said on an assured tone but really surprised and babyish: « and however it turns »! If he lived now, the scholar would not miss to add: « for how long? ».
http://www.daily-payday.com/index.php?id=37481
